Search results

hmm we did a bit of coding in year 12, basically anything in the syllabus that could be coded, our teacher told us to code... which was good.... ahh yeah when we did evolution of programming langs, we got to use a language from each of the paradigms to see how the syntax is formed and how...

the best two readings to do, or rather the ones which somewhat made sense to me were the post colonial reading and a religious/spiritual reading.... make sure you cover post colonial from both a aboriginal and european/white viewpoint lol... ahh the more ypu read and think, cloudstreet...

maths was the 2 units that didn't count towards my UAI.... but as mentioned somewhere above it does help you to think logically, so even though you may not necessarily be good at maths in terms of remembering formulas and stuff, just doing it alone, helps in other aspects where you have to...

yeah by having referential integrity, it ensures that your relationships are valid... ie if you have 2 tables that are meant to have a 1 : 1 relationship, it ensures that only that can occur.... whereas if you didn't have it, then you could literally 1 : n relationship (which would be data...

which in turn somewhat helps reduce data redundancy

when we did multimedia last year, we didn't really have to develop an 'actual' product. we had a scenario, and we just had to storyboard our design for the entire site as well as show all multimedia elements used, navigation structure. etc etc. we also had to write about file formats to use...

have a look at: http://courses.cs.vt.edu/~csonline/MachineArchitecture/Lessons/CPU/Lesson.html also check out and go through the flash animation links they help heaps.... but heres the paragraph which probably answres your question: ... Thus both inputs to the CPU are stored in memory...

are you doing your database in Access? 'cos if you are when you do your relationships, make sure referential integrity is ticked and it'll make sure you can't delete a record if a related record exists in another table etc etc........

ahh ic... hehe i was lost hehe, but in the process your boosting your post count.... :D

cool congrats...... but to the original algorithm that you were given which was f$%^d up.... did you mean the one I posted up the top?, or you saying like one you got from school? 'cos me quite confused if it was the one I posted... 'cos it sure makes sense

hmm good point Bon. Sorts aren't hard AJC. Once you know the logic, it pretty much stays with you. Simply pass the array to a sort procedure to do the sorting... well its own procedure isn't completley necessary, but it is good to practise writing nice and neatley structured/organised...

hmm I know Maq has a B Sci Dip Ed and a B Sci Dip Ed... but it doesn't really matter....... courses like the above are 4 years. You can more or less do any standard Bachelor course at uni, then do the Dip Ed part as a Post Grad and its only 1 year for it. So it turns out the same... 3 yrs...

declare an array with 1000 elements..... using a FOR - NEXT loop cycle through each element, generating a random number, then assigning it to the coresponding element of the array. then to display in a text box, just loop through the array again..... to generate an assign: array[1 to...

the req is 3 uni maths?!? thats totally f$%#$d! Like seriously... maths helps thinking wise, but whether your good at maths means little, unless of course what your developing requires lots of mathematical expressions/knowledge. in my class (SDD) i was the second worse at maths (only did 2U...

mostly from an interest in the area... most i guess have dabbled in various languages in their own free time...... self-learning is the best form of learning in certan aspects... hhe if it doesn't work the first time... keep trying... even though that sometimes drives me crazy

it was okay, though i now wished i should've left early on the last day to make it back for my preso assembo.. which i heard was heaps fun... all i can say..... bullants......

so's Info Tech VET. if your doing good in it don't drop it. A high band 5 in ITV was better than my band 5 in Maths... oh but how boring level II content was

It's by Carole Wilson. Published by Cambridge University Press. I've only read the option topic and a few pages here and there from her book. If anything, its better than the Heinenman.

hmm we only ever had group work in year 11.. in year 12 we had a test for communication as well as info systems an assignment for multimedia, tps and project work.... our project was the least weighting if i recall correctly 15% with multimedia and tps being the most (they were combined into...

B Sci Info Tech Dip It Prof Prac @ UTS 4 years