Search results

Here here. There should have been more harder binomial. I was so expecting this as a question 7. Was not expecting that dog of a projectile question. Then again, if a lot of people found that hard then I guess it deserved to be there. Still...binomial proofs would have been nice since I prepared...

What happens if you did better in 4 unit than you did in 3 unit in terms of UAI??

The Newton question was the one that screwed me up for time. Did the stupid thing in degrees and got an answer of around 4 which was obviously wrong cause it was no where near 1.5. But I didn't know what I did wrong. 5 min later I realised had to convert 1.5 degrees into radians. Did the shit...

Yeah the diagram was deceptive. The key was to draw your north and east axes on an angle so as not to confuse.

Man I was about the same. I estimated 12,12,9,6,8,5,6 give or take a few. The geometry in 4d & 6b really fucked me up. I got 1 out of 13 marks for that section. But yeah I agree it was an average-hard test.

It's in another thread somewhere. I think it was 2799 for the distance or somewhere thereabouts.

Man these geometry questions. You either see em or you don't. I mean the 4 Unit geometry question was easy for me cause I could see the answer before I even wrote anything on paper. The 3 unit geometry questions I just couldn't see them for some reason.

I think most of these high marks will be coming from 4 unit studetns but how did the two unit people do. Any high mark estimates from you guys??

Ah Fuck!! I can't believe I couldn't see it. It's right there!!! I was bloody looking at tri AGE & CFH instead of AGB &CFB. Man (i) makes all the difference to the entire (b) question. 7 marks! Unbelievable. Congrats ND on your 3 Unit performance.

I'm an average student and I thought I answered all the straight forward text book type questions in the exam that an average student would. ~70/120 I reckon. Which by the looks of things seems to be the average.

I just don't touch thosesomething.something...something questions with a 10 foot pole. They're just out of my league. :) But yeah parts (a) and (b) were a gift 10 marks I reckon for a question 7.

Sweet. I got a number that started with a 7 and had four digits too. :) Time for this question screwed me up too. I'm an idiot because I decided to write the tan16 and tan23 values in decimal form straight away instead of leaving it till the end of the equation to punch em in to the calc. As...

Q6 (b) Anyone care to explain please.

Ok I thought that test was harder than 2001 and 2002. What ever happened to the STANDARD projectile motion and exponential growth and decay questions that they put in for the past ten years??? That shits me. Think I got 60 overall. 12, 12, 9, 7, 9, 5, 6 Stupid Q4 (b) screwed up my...

Shit. Everyone is getting like 70s. :( Around 60 for me. Fucked my timing bad and couldn't get around to the big mark questions. Shit.

Well I think I will crack 70/120 or at least be somewhere around 70. I'm really happy about my performance because I know my limits and I did the questions that I could. No need to agonise over the really hard questions if you know they are out of your limits. That was my take on the exam.

Yeah I think you're right

What raw mark do you need if you want to get in the 50th percentile??

Yep right here. :D I ended my section II story like this. "They say a picture is worth a thousand words. This picture of change was worth an infinite" Cliche? Yes Do I care? No :D

Jenna Jameson is a millionaire porn star. ;)