RyddeckerSMP
Go The Knights!
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2004
- Messages
- 342
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2005
It seems that they are all equal, but some are more equal than others then...
Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
It's called scaling - 80% raw doesn't get 80, it gets higher. By the same token, 99 raw doesn't get 99, it gets 100.Templar said:Think there's decimal point involved in the original rankings, then they just rounded it off to the nearest integer, hence 5 guys getting 100 but only one ranked as number one.
I'm another random that got 1st in 3 unit maths (back in 2002) and at the time I wondered about this issue as well. I could definitely see how I got 100%, just answered all the questions and got them right, but I couldn't see why nobody else got full marks. Out of all the people who I'm sure were smarter than me I think somebody would have got it.It seems that they are all equal, but some are more equal than others then...
I wasn't directing it at you. Just trying to correct a few misconceptions, such as me possibly receiving a place in 4unit. Be good if I did, and I'll certainly aim for it, but it's like a secondary objective.Estel said:To slide rule: maybe you're just doing it completely for fun. But then your maths faculty is probably not a Nazi-run fascist entity.
It's scary like that, I didn't get it either, the same thing happened in 2003 and this year. Only one person got full marks. The odds of that are minimal. (I'd like to know what I got in the 3 unit exam, that would be interesting).martin said:I'm another random that got 1st in 3 unit maths (back in 2002) and at the time I wondered about this issue as well. I could definitely see how I got 100%, just answered all the questions and got them right, but I couldn't see why nobody else got full marks. Out of all the people who I'm sure were smarter than me I think somebody would have got it.
Anyway I never figured the answer out so if anybody has access to the raw marks or something how does this work?
Yes, this is correct - the First in Course List and Top Achievers in Course List are both determined by raw HSC marks to one decimal place.Templar said:Think there's decimal point involved in the original rankings, then they just rounded it off to the nearest integer, hence 5 guys getting 100 but only one ranked as number one.
Xayma said:Ext 1: Probably 99