MuffinMan
Juno 15/4/08 :)
Is that advisable?
Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
Like we've been shown conclusively in the Pam Bradley thread, you don't get marked down for quoting a textbook.angelduck said:NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
you could say that: <author of antiquity 2> has inferred from these primary sources <list sources> such and such.
DO NOT quote from textbooks, use them to justify what you believe the primary sources state!!
See problems of pamela bradley thread for more info!!
Excellent! Band 6 response!angelduck said:sorry, should have been more specific there, okay, dont JUST quote textbooks. It is okay to quote these, but back up with actual sources like the other example. You can state what the historians infer from other sources. There is a good example of how to do this in the Egypt thread (entitled, read my Thutmose essay i think..)
To restate - you can quote textbooks, but dont just quote them use them to justify what primary sources state. This is easy to do with Bradly, coz she basically just infers stuff from primary sources, and in the back of the book it says which source she uses (in one of theb appendixes)
Hope that clears it up. Sorry if i wasnt specific enough
...>2nd year uni historians/students > hsc students > those who enjoy doing maths and science.rhapsody11 said:Primary Evidence > Old-school historians > New-school historians > text-book historians.
Are you also suggesting that 2nd year uni students > 1st year ones?AsyLum said:...>2nd year uni historians/students > hsc students > those who enjoy doing maths and science.
Wow, thanks for the new development contrary to what has been officially told to us.niteshade1312 said:You should never quote pam bradly anyways because shes not a historian, she is actually a text book writer!