Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
No could you please elaborate? I presume your referring to the metaphorical "barrier" of my previous post.011 said:Wide if you're crap, slim if you're good. If that makes sense.
hmmm...i've heard that too. Very dissapointing considering that I was thinking about doing graduate law...Minai said:I've read articles saying that because of the sharp increase in Law schools over the last 10 years, there's now more law graduates than there is demand for them.
Rubbish. Lack of skill is widely valued. Become a farmer. The feild's getting crowded.santaslayer said:The most valued thing in todays society is skill. No one will turn you away from a job if you have the skillz.
Even if you're AzN.![]()
Then again "3" in the city have no problem specifying that you must speak canto and mando to get a job therenatstar said:there definetly should NOT be any barriers for non- caucasian backgrounds. If they dont employ you becuase of that- thats discrimination, which is against the law.
It is my understanding that the opportunities for law graduates are excellent, because law is a very diverse field and there are many businesses that value and require the services of legal experts, not just actual lawyers. The job prospects for lawyers is less so. "Since 1990, the number of law schools in Australia has risen from 12 to 29. Between 1993 and 2003, the number of students enrolled in law courses leapt from 16,490 to 38,695, according to the Department of Education, Science and Training.""The legal industry has grown at an average of 7 per cent - double the rate of general economic growth - for the past decade, according to Jason Baker, general manager Australia for business analysts IBISWorld. And it looks set to keep growing.
More rules governing our daily lives mean greater and more varied job opportunities for lawyers.
Beyond the Law, SHM - March 02, 2005.
The potential 'barrier' would come from lesser speaking/English experience. If you can't speak and argue as well as someone else, then the employer would (rightly so) take that into consideration. It isn't a matter of race, it is a matter of ability and skill.natstar said:there definetly should NOT be any barriers for non- caucasian backgrounds. If they dont employ you becuase of that- thats discrimination, which is against the law.
Yeah, but that's because certain legal firms target their services at a certain race of people. These firms require someone who are able to speak certain languages purely because their clients cannot speak English effectively. These firms, in my opinion, actually remedy certain disadvantages presented to non English speaking people in the legal system.natstar said:Yeah its understandable that if you can not speak the lanaguage needed to do the job, becuase its reather like a skill. But this is Australia, sure we might be multicultural, but personaly its a bit silly if we want to get a job in our own country and cant at some places becuase we cant speak another lanaguage. Oh well