one of my psychology lectures clashes with one of the two of my math lectures per week. Does that mean i would have to give up on Math? :(
Or do i have an option of sacrificing one of my math lectures every week and proceed with these two courses?
cheers</SPAN>
one of my psychology lectures clashes with one of the two of my math lectures per week. Does that mean i would have to give up on Math? :(
Or do i have an option of sacrificing one of my math lectures every week and proceed with these two courses?
cheers
For example, Year 1s can choose ACCT1501Accounting and Financial Management 1A because the code ACCT starts with "1" (ACCT1501), but not ACCT2522Management Accounting 1 becuase the code for this starts with "2"? (ACCT2522)
is this the correct way of identifying which courses are avaliable at...
i see phrases lyk, UNSW Payment Due Date for Semester 2 tuition fees (T2/T2A and T2B) and Census Date for Semester 1 - T1 and T1A..
wat does all these terminologies mean? thanks
well.. im intending to transfer into something else in the 2nd year, and i just need enough marks (HD or D ) in order to trasnfer. So ye.. taking shortcut as such in the first year might actually be a smart move for me...
For example, in the case of [Introductory Chemistry] and [Higher Chemistry 1A], even simply by looking at the 'Assumed knowledge', it is evident that Introductory Chemistryis easier and simpler in terms of the course difficulty.
So my question is, wouldn't a guy with HSC mark of 100 in chem...
thanks for the recommendations guys. so it seems that MATH1131 scales more than MATH1011? or is this not true? And wat if i totally ace MATH1011, would that still be less worthy than MATH1131? (similar to getting band 6 in Eng Stndrd compared to Eng adv in HSC ). thanks
i achieved HSC Mathematics 97/100 and HSC Mathematics Ext. 46/50.
so im assuming whether i do MATH1011 or MATH1131, difficulty isnt gonna be issue for me. the thing is, apprently theres the 'scaling' system in uni as well, i heard? and being the easier one, i thought MATH1011 would 'scale' less...
cos the reason i might do architecture is to get the GPA that i need for Comm law, not to mention that if i fail transferring, i dont mind pursuing architecture.
On the other hand, Doing commerce just by itself isnt an option for me, becuase i dont have intention to pursue commerce if i fail...
If say, I get a UAI of 95ish, and get into USYD archtecture for the first year, and then try transferring the second yr into USYD Comm/Law, what sort of GPA shud i b aiming for? is D-average not enough with UAI 95sh? thanks
Also, could neone give me some figures for the number of people who...
haha ok
although that 'assuming aceing trials' post of mine was actually the third LAST post of the nine posts of my questions, and not my original question which i got between 95-97 with, thanks for ur opinion
one thing left for me to do...
ACE TRIALS & HSC!!! :uhhuh:
thanks for u guys' opinions.
rofl i jus cant help but realise how unreliable uai prediction can be. this is my 2nd post regarding the prediction.
http://community.boredofstudies.org/showthread.php?p=3604677#post3604677
My first prediction above, with actually WORSE rank i think...