Search results

def 1 point. 10 goals means that u played totally shithouse. 1 point means that u werent as shit as u couldve been. btw- could someone tell me why jarrod mcveigh didnt bomb it into the goal square?

maybe this means that in the finals we'll beat them by 1 point. or 10 goals would be better... (if only)

written for me. especially in sciences like bio where you can reference the syllabus dot point then straight underneath write the info. Also, i can draw my funny little diagrams etc.

i hate west coast...

i know. they say that sydneys game is slow and crap cuz of all the stoppages, but they just create more with shit rules like this.

Daniel Kerr in trouble? What a shame, better chance for swans. Couldnt imagine someone like Kirk in trouble after a late night out. Speaks volumes doesnt it?

can anyone out there help me out on techniques in the movie chicago related to ttt? or jack johnsons song 'cookie jar'? any help appreciated. ta.

are you suprised that females like cricket? im a female too *gasp*, i play in male comp with U16's that dad coaches cuz girls are allowed to play down a year. I also play in sydney womens comp 2nd grade. my battings gone down the shitter but my bowlings ok.

assembly, timetable (lost my double afternoon free dammit :mad1: ) then 4 lessons in which we got back three assessments from last term. What holidays??

I agree. Look how well we've done over the last decade without an all rounder in the squad. Its just the andrew flintoff fad atm thats got everyone all jumpy. As much as i hate to admit it, hes a great player and its rare to find another as talented as him. Just stick with the formula thats...

Warning- do not read this post if u havent seen past series 5... I warned you. Alda took over on occasion in season 6, when charles came in for frank. He took a more permanent role when radar left. i stopped watching it after that. Got crap. Esp. the episode called "dreams" or something with...

does anyone actually think brett lee should be dropped?? What a joke. next they'll be picking lehmann... jj.

I think the selectors should stick with the same 1st test winning team, although they seem to be stuck on the idea that watson can play. My bet is that Clarke will be dropped for Watson, even though it makes no logical sense. Btw, loved the jokes. Keep em coming

i used to be a fan, until alan alda took over behind the camera and made it shit... and they all started getting grey hair and less funny

No way england will draw, even if langer and ponting get hundreds. If they bat on, they'll look to accelerate anyway, maybe give gilly a go if a wicket falls quickly.

Who ever doubted Pidgeon? And stu clark is too much like mcgrath? Isnt that a good thing? Beautiful work aus, the only prob is the captain is yet to bat. Once hes gone, Australia to shit it in.:)

Clarke should have been in the original squad anyway. Watsons not test match quality, even against a depleted england. On the Jaques/Langer front, i think the selectors made the right choice with Langer, hes still good enough to play and jaques will be all the more mature and better to replace...

England are no hope to win the ashes if we pick this team... Hayden Jaques Ponting Martyn Hussey Clarke Gilchrist Lee Warne Clark Mcgrath Although it would be hard to omit langer... The poms are in trouble if our PM's XI can slaughter them