I've heard the same thing from my careers adviser, relatives involved in the co-op program already etc.
With ranks, I am sure they take into consideration the level of competition at your school.
Does anyone know what the competition is like for the engineering ones? Is it true that you work...
Yep typed the wrong thing. That's what I meant- couldn't remember the question entirely.
Yeah my bad, should've re-read the question before explaining it.
Note the question is a tariff of $15 ABOVE the market price.
So, at $25, the government earns nothing because the market is solely supplied by the domestic industry.
At $20, the difference between the quantity supplied and the quantity demanded is 20.
The value of the tariff is $10, so 10x20...
You can't really compare the two topics. Inflation will be done far better by the cohort than environment- because no one studies the environment topic.
Seriously, forget about it. Go party. Your HSC is over and I'm jealous :(
Expansionary monetary policy = lower the cash rate.
So, to lower the cash rate, the RBA BUYS CSGs back from commercial banks, hence depositing money into exchange settlement accounts and decreasing the demand of funds in the overnight money market. This decreases the cash rate.
So if the RBA...
I first outline the aims of environmental policy (reversing anthropocentric damage, resolving the tragedy of the commons, internalising the externality etc). Pretty much all the theory about why the environment needs to be protected went here.
Then, I talked about the policy methods:
- command...
This is what I said as well, but it all comes down to which is the "best" answer. In hindsight, A is probably the better answer.
Sounds like we wrote the same essay :)
Inflation was definitely an "easier" essay than the inequality one.
I feel for the people who didn't study either the case study or environment... two things that could easily be overlooked.
Note it says *existing* airport. If you're building another airport, the number of jobs will likely decrease at the existing one.
Decreased traffic is still a positive externality, whether it was intended or otherwise.
I thought that was a pretty good exam. I made a few stupid mistakes in the multi choice (18/20) but otherwise it was fine.
I ended up doing the labour/fiscal essay + environment. I suspect that's not a popular combo :(
I got wrecked, probably something in the 70s. I thought the start was much harder than most of the past papers, and they skipped the classic giveaways like roots of unity, induction etc.