Search results

it's not that i didn't like the movie, cause i did, but i felt the concept had the potential to be much more interesting than it was. apart from the ending, which was the only thing stopping the film from being totally forgettable, the main premise wasn't explored as much as it could have been

and you are now INCREDIBLY sexually appealing

you mean, you expected it to not be stupid and a waste of money?

i hated this movie for so long, all the while not quite knowing what made it so terrible. finally i figured it out. the movie assumes you are an idiot. that's the only possible way to enjoy it. you must be an idiot

pretty, but dull

he basically runs the place, but no one realises it

ryan o'reily is my hero also, regarding beecher-keller

and since when is per capita income directly proportional to population size?

i don't know, now i'm all confused. before you said homosexuality was wrong because the majority agreed. but now you're saying that's not the case. what about homosexuality makes it inherently wrong? it can't be the bible...otherwise tax fraud would be ok... so some parts of the bible are more...

take that kfunk! that scientific graph that had heaps to do with population growth sure took you down a peg! so take your abortion lovin ass to africa where it's ok to murder children. just as long as you don't do it here

so you're just pointing out that homosexuality is wrong because the majority has agreed it's wrong, and we should accept that. you're right. that's not conforming, it's just accepting reality as you've pointed out, the homosexual marriage debate is over, and the gays have lost. there is no...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person

listen up, ntb, don't you understand that polls showing the majority accepting homosexuality are wrong? only the polls rejects homos are right. we covered this with political correctness

what's the difference? if you are part of society, you should conform to the majority, no matter what the issue "I have a problem with changing society even the slightest to accomidate such people" the individual should adapt to society, not the other way round

exactly. all religions in the entire world explicitly forbid homosexuality. and every religious person agrees with this stance i agree. there is a trend back to the correct traditional values. i think miscegenation is coming back. so much terror has been caused by interracial marriage. we...

why are you backtracking? you clearly don't believe society should change in order to help a minority. the majority of australians don't like hip hop, so why should our radiowaves be subjected to its crapness? surely you must agree? hip hop cannot be considered progress, it is a terrible...

Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, Malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix.

no, i'm agreeing that society shouldn't change. ever. there should be laws that prohibit social change, it is currently far too easy for radicals to pervert the foods we eat

back then they couldn't marry whites. and that's the way it should be. they had the right to marry someone of their race, which is the same right whites had. it's not discrimination