question was
genre sets a framework of conventions
how useful is it to understand textx in terms of genre? are texts more engaging when they conform to the conventions, or when they challenge and play with the conventions?
in your answer, draw on your knowledge of at least 2 prescribed...
coming to this site and forums have made me think that i didnt put in things i should have.... damn this site made me feel better bout my other subjects just not this one
how does everyone write that much,, how big is your writing, like how many words on a line ???????
cause i know i write slow with 12pages 7pages but like 20 and 10 pages or 4 booklets thats a damn lot
oh well quality over quanity....
but analysing is in everything we do, in some way or sort, or the problem is we just cant help but try and analyse now that we are used of it....part of our human instinct
how cuold you talk about that many texts?????
did you just mention the m briefly
i talked about 2 prescribed and 2 additional but like 3- pages on each...... it was a very basic yet good question.......essay is my strong point...
forgot to say what i did, i did phillip marlowe and how Hawkes had him it two frames of mind from materialistic to moral restoring and then made adjustments to say how Marlowe could be fully moral orientated to fix the disaffection with humanity of the 40's
yeah not totally screwed but still bad enough, ran out of things to talk about after 3 pages and went on bout crap for another 4, oh well.....the markers will have the odd thing of marking it cause it wont test that much knowledge, more opinion which i guess is important too, to see if we can...