HSC-rocker and HSC-king
both got banned
with that kind of attitude they deserve to fail their HSC, i donno if they will but i sure as hell hope that if they act that selfish in real life they are miserable until they die
thanks for clearing that up dal, now wouldnt it all be good if hsc maggot cunt rocker left the forum..everybody throw ya hands up
HSC rock fuckers lovin the cock right about.......NOW!
well said mate,
u have to respect that not everyone in the world is a fukn einstein,
if u wanna be happy in life, u wont rank other people who arent as smart as you just to make urself feel better, or get shits and giggles
quoting my own post so i dont look like a gloater
despite the fact that i did find indochina easy, i had difficulty with core topic and i didnt write very much for albert speer part ii) or the germany question
but its quality over quantity so... i guess anyones outcome is definantly open...
get over urself mate, noone likes gloater, lot of ppl who arent academic are really nice ppl, maybe you should try leaving your study desk and making friends one day?
urgh here we go again, more poeple going on about how easy they think everything is, why is it that strait after an exam u go onto this forum with a bunch of ppl u;ve never seen befor and start having a bat over how easy u thought everything was.... GET OVER IT fuktard, noone wants to here you...
blacksnak,
i rekon im in ur boat for WW1, i couldnt remember anything about the big 3's debate sp i BS'd (literally made stuff up there on the spot cus i didnt know anything... based on what the sources said though.)
so im expecting about 15/30 for WW1 tops i rekon
Germany - 4
Indo - 8
Speer A) - 3
Speer b) - 3
memeber its not quantity... its quality
for the trial i wrote 4.5 in germany and i got 15/20, thought that was pretty fair.lol
anyways its over, and gives a FUKC ABOUT HISTORY ANY MORE !!!MUAHAHAHA
IM BURNING HISTORY BOOKS.. NO...
well i couldnt remember anything about the big threes debate
just guesed and said that french guy (whateva his fukn name was) and Lloyd George were cut-throat in their approach, whereas wilson was m ore diplomatic, so as not to be greedy
and my answer to reliability of sources C&D was a...