Im sure there have been, and i hate to be the bearer of bad news but :(
Subjects just get harder as you go, and once youve done about 8 subjects, changing your GPA becomes VERY hard. First year subjects are kind of a joke usually.
That being said, your subjects would only have been worth 3...
Year Study Period Unit Title Mark Grade Description Credits
2006 First Half Year ACST300 Insurance & Super Practice 69 CR Credit 4
2006 First Half Year ACST354 Survival Models 71 CR Credit 4...
Actually this time i did login like an hour in advance, and i did keep refreshing, but then it wouldnt refresh for like 15 minutes, and then when it finally did "i had logged out" so here i am
Huy hahahaha.. WELL IN MAN =) i got 98.2.. and i thought your 98+ was completely wrong... thanks for the estimate yesterday man.. guess ill get my course :D
Hmm well that makes me feel better, im hoping to get into Maquarie Commerce/Law.. last year the entry mark was 95.35 so dunno how much it ll go up this year.. im guessing by about 1.5 at most (who knows tho)
Would anyone be able to run this through uai seeker
Thanks again guys.. may be...
98+ are you serious man...
i was thinkin 95 myself
I really really really wanna get 97 =(
i know your guessing.. but like how confident are you =p
thanks btw
Me too please, heh... Didnt do as well as i hoped in the end
Chemistry 86
Economics 90
English (Advanced) 91
English Extension 40
Mathematics 95
Mathematics Extension 46
Physics 89
I have no idea how to study for economics.. i mean all my other subjects were fine make notes learn them etc.. but ive found for economics.. the dot points are tooooo broad :( so i dont have any idea how i should do it.. it was the only subject i didnt make notes for this year, and the notes ive...
Hi, i was wondering if anyone knows the common types of reactions (eg combustion, netuarlisation etc etc) and the reactants and products formed.. i would love them in generic if possible like Acid + Base ---> Salt + Water (even i know that one :p)
Thanks :D
Yeah. putting the magnetic field first to measure the radius would be stupid.. as you have to adjust the magnetic field to equal the electric field anyway (i believe he left the electric field constant strength the whole time .. and thus was able to equate mv2/r at the end)