Search results

I've just basically put them all under s32(a)(iii) the circumstances of the offence, saying how weak the prosecution case is due to the evidence against Andrew i.e the moustache, the 'big nose' and the finding of a 'similar gun' in his brothers house.

Hey chocolatecake, I'm doing the same question as you (question 2 right?) Ok i'm finished but looking over the bail app, did u mention anything about the credibility of the witness ? or the finding of the gun at his brothers house? :confused: the prosecutions case in general ?

i seemed to have misplaced my paper. would anybody do me a favour and post it up ? much appreciated ! x

Ive also attempted to draft a response to this question, im just not clear on how to structure the essay and i find great difficulty linking the historians. HeideggerII i would greatly appreciate if you could send me your essay so i can obtain a basic overview of what is expected. if thats...