worth applying for clerkships if you're only in second yr? or would firms think you dont have enough stuff on ur resume for them to evaluate u yet, after all, there are 4th yr pplz applying for these too
Was wondering if anyone has more knowledge about which one of these courses is better and more relevant to someone who's doing Applied Finance/Law. Which of these actually teaches you how to use computer programs, spreadsheets n databases? I dont really want to learn about algorithms or writing...
i thot section 1 was a bit hard in that the author didn't give a concrete statement on what they thought, it was just strings of rhetorical questions.....that made it hard for me to make an actual judgement on him
section 2 was fine - quote was pretty accessible, though it seemed the quote...
hey tess, i'm wondering the exact same thing. I called up the hotline too, the stimulus in the hsc wont always require us to talk about PM vs M.
Say that's the case this year, what other stuff is there to say since PM vs M is all we learned.....
Are we meant to just somehow find a way...
omg.....i'm so tempted to just study for one of them - wars of DL
this chapter has soooo much detail in it, cant remember it all
plus is the key democratic dot-point still in the syllabus? my teacher says it's not anymore
and the nature, composition of pelop league is only a minor...
don't worry too much about modern hisotirans, stick with the primary ones - herodotus, thucydides
tho some good modern ones are
- bradley
- bury and meiggs
the marking centre notes said not to use heaps and heaps of historians, only when ur making a strong point, otherwise it;d just look...
hey does anyone know if these two dot-points need to be learnt and what are the chances of them asking a question on the two
* key democractic developments: influence of thetes, ostracism, citizenship law
* nature, composition and acitivities of the Peloponnesian League
it seems this...
least u guys actually based ur story on the quote...i merely inserted it in like the second last sentence...forming part of the description, i didn't get wat they meant by using it as a central idea
i couldn't see any ideas or concepts in those quotes, they were just broken phrases to me lol...
we got this question in the trials, our teacher said it's actually inviting you to talk about the new reseach and technolgies stuff too. Has anyone else been told that by their teacher? Cuz not many of us did in the trial, even if we did, we touched on it. The dot-point is focusing on ethical...
i'm finding his contribution really obscure....like wat the heck wat the key thing he discovered? All texts say that he used Volta's pile to electrolyse water, and decomposed molten salts, soemthng like that. But what does that show about electron transfer movements? What was the discovery? And...
Does anyone know what some of the historians have said about the Dioscuri? it's under myths and legends.......they don't seem to have been very Spartan, otehr than having grown up in Sparta...otherwise mostly worshipped by the Romans
hey pplz........just say the historians that u learn cant be applied to the stimulus in the exam....i mean wat the hell do u do then?!
like non of the historians u've memorised fits into the stimulus, that means u have nothing to bloody base ur essay on.....
and also....is it just me...
i know, that's what i'm worried about - not being able to understand what he writes in the first place, let alone contruscting an arguement using it. do you know where i can find some good notes?
I agree! Dob him in! otherwise it's just not fair, cuz everybody else has to come up with their own and spend all the effort and time
but yea do it in private with ur teacher n tell them not to mention ur name to the student of course