this is the topic im doing, if u dont know, the Alexander historians (at least the ancient ones) provide very conflicting stories.
im adressing how this effects us in attempting to write a modern history of alexander and how we can establish which of the histories are more reliable.
do u think...
im looking for sum notes on the different schools, lyk marxist and post modernist and empirical and all. i looked in the resources but those are more historian specifc. ne help is appreciated
incase you didnt know thers a new study guide out done by webb, the same guy thats done the get smart series, i was wondering if ne1 has it and thinks its worth getting?
ive recently been asked to produce a draft essay of my project. i started trying to write it and i had nooo idea what i was meant to be writting about....!
i also started to think that perhaps my topic is not so appropriote...
my broad topic is Alexander Historiography and i intend to argue...