Search results

how much is yours? im getting ripped off... 172 bucks.

you better off throwing a coin and decide... or why not just do both. and the one that you don't come first in assessments, just don't spend as much time revising it for the hsc exam. one more thing you might not have realised: hsc exam mark does not equals to "raw" or real exam mark.

? what is it about?

ahhh... lavoisier the father of modern chemistry. but whats with him and his oxygens... just because he named it he has to conclude everything contained oxygen... idiot.

hahaha... you're funny

umm... interesting... thanks people. :)

not according to my teacher. our first assessment was one topic of year12 and the rest is year 11. and our half yearly is gonna be 50% year 11 and 12.

its an illusion.

it would but i don't see why its neccesary. money is good and supers is expensive.

oh wait... nah... you have to buy it from your school.

remember the formulas and do questions.

i know. im bad. :p

its been posted

no.

but one could judge the smartness by looking at the cut off for 100 or whatever other uai, and by compensating for the continue shift to higher scales of this refined scaling system.

i am pretty sure. the philosophy of the scaling system: choosing a more difficult course over a less difficult course will not disadvantage nor advantage the individual, this works vice versa. but "without" scaling, choosing a more difficult course obviously is a disadvantage. there are...

we haven't done our hsc yet... if you consider hsc to indicate smartness.

what? it must be you.

modern history: hsc 90 ----> uac: 80.2 ancient history: hsc 90 ----> uac: 77.8 to tell you the truth trying to compare different subject is stupid. just do your best subject and the best result will come.

umm what is the use of prime numbers? is there any use at all? edit: and why are you up so early?