Recent content by windebygirl

i think its best to get 2 with differing views and then discuss (i.e. find other historians who agree with one and show why one is more credible or something) hope it's going well!

obviously everyone's different, but my advice would be to not stress yourself out too much with learning the content. obviously it's something you have to know, but I always did better when I didn't actively try to remember everything. take a break from writing notes and just really listen to...

pretty sure that projectiles was only tested in mc last year meaning we're almost guaranteed some big question in q11-14 can't be any worse than the ext 2 5 marker...

Hey guys, one of the trial questions this year (cssa i think?) was 'to what extent have the reasons people study history changed over time?' so how would you answer that? because i'm getting tripped up on the word 'study', coz 'studying' history is obv not the same as 'constructing' history...

8 marks of last years q14 was combinatorics/binomials why would they do it again we'll defs get some fat projectile tho, but it should be fun

afraid not i think that is the equivalent of writing a SOR Christianity essay on jesus lmao

speers is the architect guy - not super important coz literally all he did was build stuff goebbels is defs the easiest choice fun goebbels fact: on his birthday one year, the government gave everyone free radios (Volksempfänger)

the best thing about anti war movement essays is that you can link everything back to the awm. so you wanna do a para on tet? link it to anti war movement . military strategies were televised (vietnam was the television war etc etc) and thus contributed to the awm. so if i were doing that...

hiiiiiiiiii i'm on 12 units doing 4u math and hist ext 100% worth it - workload actually isn't that bad, obviously it's stressful at times but you could say that about literally any yr 12 subjects do it - and lmk if u have any questions they're my 2 favourite subjects, so if you're considering...

i had to do 2 debates in trials and i got marked down for putting both debates in each paragraph - it makes it harder for the marker to figure out which debate you're talking about so as much as i hate to say, i feel like i'm gonna do 2 really fat body paragraphs... someone please tell me that's...

there'll probs be one question on laos/cambodia (there always is), and the other will be broader i would say. homefront, tet, strats/tacts are probably what they would go for i reckon but i have a feeling geneva might be something they pull out... haven't done one of those in a while.

they can ask questions based on the survey so yeah you need to know it but it's like the easiest part

it still hasn't sunk in that the exam is like a month away and i have nothing memorised and the amount of quotes and stuff you have to know to be prepared for all possible questions is insane at this point i'll be happy with a band 3

good question - i have no idea. my teachers said they 'have a feeling' (and apparently they've been right in the past) but considering that in the last 2 years they've done a question on stalin each time, i wouldn't be surprised if they did another stalin question - possibly related to ideology...

i don't have the whole paper's solutions but this question was in my trial and here's the answer