Recent content by Smokin'Squirrel

I'd say the former are worse... if you're gonna have to spend 2 hrs with these people for 13 weeks, it's atleast useful if they know what their talking about. Also, for those doing law and looking for texts, I found this handy little website which offers law texts 20% off. Happy hunting...

ACCG310... 71 CR Law114... 76 D Law204... 82 D That 95 in ACCG253 was freaky... and you were probably competing against all the actuarials too!

If I was that borderline to passing, I'd ask the head lecturer if a remark was possible. You may just get away with a couple more passes.

I still think it's weird to finish with that marking system without full marks. I mean, their not exactly going to give you a final mark of 73.4 when we get the course results. (I would have marked out of 100 and then rounded to the nearest full mark... although, I'm an accouting student so...

But dear Watson, when they fail to include the r, it may give the illusion of deriving from the same root word when used in the context of ye old English. I won't pick on your use of 'stemmically'.:D I don't think that they were inclined to give full marks. I got 32/40 which equates to an 80...

Ok... interstitial... it was a hurried post. edit: I just re-read my post and I spelt it correctly the first time. It was spelt wrong when referencing what was in the text. Having said that, my point was that these sort of errors are common throughout the primary sources as they have been...

I have to admit I havn't done all the readings. I read most of the early ones and I've read the latests stuff on feminism and rights. Although, there's a big gap in the middle. Some of the primary sources are just too difficult to read, sometimes due to the language used and also grammatical or...

I wouldn't say that it's easy but accounting subjects seem fairly easy if you have a plan of attack for given questions. If you look for the patterns in solutions and actually understand how everything interrelates, it doesn't seem so irrational. My advice to you would be to go through the hw...

In the original thread, I was just having a little bit of fun which led to an abusive assault. I'm surprised that someone would have taken my satirical banter so closely to heart. I'm not sure if that is applicable. Originally I thought that the facts were in relation to Max being a manager...

Maybe you’re under the misapprehension that someone will do the assignment for you if you post up a vague question. Strike 3... you're out! lol Grammar: "Does any one du Contracts!"(?)

How'd everyone find the assignment? I don't think it was that bad but a question would have been fairly valuable, rather than simply picking a tangent and running with it.

God has his breaking point too... :)

I did 200 in first semester last year and 253 in the second. This semester I'm doing 310. To tell you the truth I wouldn't even contemplate doing all three at the same time. Having said that, I'd probably push 253 to next semester as the topics are so broad it becomes difficult to know...

I started in Bcom and was allowed to enrol in ACCG100 and ACCG101... you shouldn't have any troubles enrolling. Although, they may have put a quota restriction as I know a lot of 2nd year accounting subjects were very very full last year. Don't worry until you have to. That's the secret to...

If I were you, I wouldn't do those subjects unless they're cores (they appear in the program of study for your undergraduate degree). Electives should represent something that you will enjoy. For example, taking up the foundations of a foreign language or exploring the myths of the ancient...