Moonlight Sonata, let me get this straight. You believe that there are creations, yet the universe wasn't created.
I believe that this is a biased application of logic.
This is what you said about creation Moonlight Sonata.
"Your confusion stems from the fact that you have already begged the question by assuming that everything was "created". You look around at the universe you call everything a "creation", before going on to say that every creation requires...
Moonlight sonata, you say that everyone assumes that we are creations, and you believe that there is no such thing as a creation and thus there is no creator (ie God).
Lets say for example that you build a house. Didn't you make or create the house with your hands? The house wasn't just...
I apologise to Not that bright for my insulting comment. I actually didn't realise that I was implementing what I was speaking against.
Again, I am sorry Not that bright.
People who don't believe in God, should provide reasoning as to why God doesn't exist.
I never claimed that science can prove the existence of God. The simple argument for his existence in my belief is this (as I've stated earlier). Non believers in God claim to use logic for God's...
"This leads us to the familiar theme of "If a creator created the universe, what created the creator?", but with the addition of spiralling improbability. The only way out is to declare that the creator was not created and just "is" (or "was").
From here we might as well ask what is wrong...
"We have discussed it, many times. The only problem is that you and all others who argue for God are completely blind to logic because they've had beliefs for so long it is unfathomable for them to question them".
Laura and I have put our logic behind the existence of God, and yes we both are...
"Is it just me or is riqtay trying to sound smart and comming off as really, really dumb?"
"AHAHAHAHAHAHA, true that. "paradoxicalas" oh mercy".
I think that instead of using petty name calling and insults, you guys should try and make an argument agianst my views, rather than the way I...
Generator, you have given no response or explanation to counter my argument. rather, you have applied dogma associated with your own beliefs.
Having your beliefs is fine and well, but there needs to be reasoning behind them (which i fail to see).
"Does't it make more sense for a supposed being beyond comprehension to be represented as a force of some sort?"
Your argument is paradoxical as you are saying that a being beyond comprehension SHOULD be represented as a force (which is comprehensible by our pathetic little minds)...
"Why does it require intelligence?"
"I am saying that the creator is energy, as it is the thing that created everything..."
Not that bright, you appear to be stating your beliefs,which is entirely fine, yet you haven't given me a well though out reasoning behind your convictions. You are...
Not that bright, you say that energy can take the position of God. I would like to ask does energy have intelligence to create intelligent beings (ie humans)?
You are thus saying that the creation is at a much higher level than the creator, which in my opinion completely dismisses the...
I believe that those who don't believe in God appear to show wisdom and logic behind their convictions, yet in actuality they use logic only in certain situations to their advantage.
They argue that a creation requires a creator, yet dismiss the concept of God. Using logic, a creation (e.g a...