Recent content by pHaTso

Soft law, as in Int. Law is hard 2 enforce... there is no Int. court, jail or police. however most NS's still choose to comply due to the fact that it's ethical/moral to maintain diplomatic relationships with other countries, as well as upholding alliances with them. my essay line was pretty...

exactly ^^ i believe quality over quantity. this boy in my class who is coming first had 6 booklets, so i can imagine how much he wrote... i write enough as i need & i'm happy with how i approached the exam, considering i'm not a "studier". GB

oh well i put that Children contributed to the make-up of a different family arrangement. firstly how ex-nups were considered as "Bastards" however the Children (Equality of Status) Act gave them inheritence rights & so forth... thus, they are equal. i also spoke about discipline... talking...

d/w i don't think u'll b "penalised" 4 not discussing children. u were pretty broad as well, so that's kool. i didn't do single parents. GB

i did B :) effectiveness again; so kool!! i first spoke about Stockholm then Rio. followed by: Sovereignty Soft Law Voluntary Jurisdiction NGO's Media GB

B> effectiveness :) Marriage (equality with women 2) De factos Same sex relationships Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Marriages Children GB

i know, i can't believe it's ALL over 4 me. 2yrz of hating legal n i actually liked the options section. crime was ok. M/C was different... i totally didn't like the short answer (non HR) Q'z!! goodluck for anybody else still sitting the HSC!! GB

M/C was a bit weird... the short answer section was stupid... i wish it focused a more on HR. Crime was ok... i really liked my option topics :) GB

Crime - 8 Family - 7.5 Global Environment - 8 GB :)

YAY Dezzy i did that 2... n i guessed half of it. *phew* i'll get some points there then hopefully. GB

wow, i left this Q til last. i wrote about defences n how community ideals as well as individual rights r balanced. i think i had 4 pagez. GB

i wrote 3 pages in regards 2 the Judge's discretion. that is, sentencing, etc. GB

Tps & Ams :) Gb

yes, but i did make a judgement with all of my content. i explained everything, backed it all up, linked it to the question, explored all ideas/values etc. it was evaluating anyway... i mean the question asked to evaluate how texts explored 19th Centurty ways of thinking. so it all fit in well...

well ofcourse, it was a critical essay. i "evaluated" my texts as in, what they were saying about their society. eg: Browning writing about the aristocracy, then criticising it. also HOW they did it - techs, quotes etc. i also always linked my paragraphs back to the question, so i answered it...