Now see...I'd be a bit jittery if all it had been was a very very very hard test - that's reasonable and the scaling will reflect it. But what's ultra annoying is when you study like crazy to get yourself up from the trial - achieve it and the forget to do half of a question in the exam ... like...
Everytime I log in to SAM it redirects me back to the login page even though I've already correctly logged in AND am logged into the forums....i'm confused
Ok...so where does the fact we are given the marks of the person who achieves the external ranking of our internal ranking . eg. If you're ranked 27th in the course after the trials (based on all the assessments) you'll get the 27th best HSC mark from your school cohort? Does that even happen?
Try skipping half a question for maths ex2 just cos you didn't see it - not like the exam wasn't hard enough...and i threw away 11 marks! *sniff* Oh well...no point dwelling...at least 3 unit counts for more now
Ok...I thought I had this sorted but clearly, I'm confused :S:S:S With our related material - we only need TWO pieces which relate two the TWO eps of Frontline we will be examining in our essay. Sturcturally, would this ideally involve a reference at teh end of each paragraph linking the concept...
Wow- that was amazing! Zillion thanks! But can i just clarify something- The syllabus refers to Medium of Production and Textual form - what's the difference? The MoP of Frontline is Television and Textual form is current affairs show? Confused:S
Ok...this is for Society and Culture but I figured this would be where I'd find all the bilinguals so here goes. I would greatly appreciate it if you could take the time to answer some of these questions:
1. Why do you study a foreign langauge? What motivated you to do it?
2. What do you...
Wouldn't Lizzy's thoughts and opinions as made evident in her diary entry be those of the individual? And she is unlikely to be expressing an opinion if it is the same as what the rest of socieyt thinks...therefore, whatever she opposes or what aspects she mentions is different from her own...
Having an anguished exploration of pardigms at the moment.... just wondering, is it fair to say that any thing that explores how something should be falls under the philosophical paradigm? So discussing how marriage should be, compatibiltty of partners, conventions etc. is more philosophical...