Hey, I wouldn't mind a copy of those notes coz I have an assessment with the road not taken in it and I don't have much info! my email is carli.duncan@gmail.com
Thanks!!!
Carlz
isn't that criminal and civil cases? not systems of law?
because the syllabus doesn't say anything about a key question saying the difference between common and civil case law stuff (as far as I can remember) I think that it's just sticking to systems..
coz in the syllabus for law and...
a just law is - acceptable, enforceable, discoverable (publically known)
institutionalised inequality is in the key questions for law and justice.. it says something like How does formal equality before the law hide institutionalised ineqaulity... macquarie had a good answer that I used...
I just talked about what the syllabus said... just about the judicial discretion - and talked about how it was evident in sentencing giving examples.. and then talked about the discretion being limited in one case by the doctrine of precedent and minimum penalties...
I did B too, didn't finish though... i had trouble relating stuff to the question again coz there hasn't been that much "peaceful settlement".. I mean through like mediation and stuff, but it doesn't use any of the legal issues or remedies... I included all the legal issues in the syllabus...
you talked about soft law? I found the essay hard but spoke about much the same things... how did you relate it to the question though?? btw, I did B too.
it's definitely about the SYSTEMS of law... and that's where heaps of people will get tricked... coz if it didn't say systems then it would just be like civil and criminal and stuff...
I did the same as dezzy :)
Ok, so my immediate thoughts would be to write along the lines of this...
One specific example of a contemporary domestic human rights struggle is the issue of children being locked up in detention centres. In Australia, any asylum seeker is detained, and there are no exceptions. (then I'd go...